Dawn Sturgess inquiry reveals Sergei Skripal was vulnerable target in Novichok poisoning case

Dawn Sturgess inquiry reveals Sergei Skripal was vulnerable target in Novichok poisoning case

The Dawn Sturgess inquiry has shed light on the vulnerability of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in the infamous Novichok poisoning case. The lack of security measures at their Salisbury residence made them easy targets for a sophisticated assassination attempt, allegedly orchestrated by the Russian state.

Unprotected targets : the Skripals’ vulnerability exposed

Michael Mansfield, a prominent figure in the inquiry, criticized the glaring absence of security for Sergei and Yulia Skripal. He emphasized that the pair were essentially “sitting ducks” due to the lack of protective measures at their home. This oversight allowed Russian agents to carry out their deadly mission with alarming ease.

The inquiry revealed that :

  • No security measures were in place at the Skripal residence
  • Sergei Skripal used his landline to discuss his movements openly
  • The Russian state had “alarming access” to Skripal’s location

These factors combined to create a perfect storm of vulnerability. Mansfield asserted that the attempted assassinations were entirely preventable, pointing to an “abject failure” by the UK government to safeguard its citizens. The ease with which the assailants accessed the Skripals’ home and applied the nerve agent to their front door highlighted the urgent need for improved security protocols for high-risk individuals.

It’s worth noting that the consequences of this security lapse extended beyond the Skripals. In a tragic turn of events, a boy was sickened after Sergei Skripal gave him duck-feeding bread in a Salisbury poisoning incident, underscoring the far-reaching impact of the attack on innocent bystanders.

Russian involvement and the deadly aftermath

The inquiry heard compelling evidence suggesting that the poisoning plot would have been authorized at the highest levels of the Russian government, potentially by President Vladimir Putin himself. Two individuals, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, were identified as Russian military intelligence officers (GRU) involved in the operation, though they have denied any involvement.

The fallout from this brazen attack extended beyond the initial targets. Dawn Sturgess, a 44-year-old woman, tragically lost her life in 2018 after coming into contact with the discarded Novichok-laced perfume bottle. Adam Straw KC, representing Ms. Sturgess’ family, described the disposal of the nerve agent as an “extremely dangerous act” that constituted an “unlawful killing.”

The impact of the Novichok attack was significant :

Impact Number of people affected
Fatalities 1 (Dawn Sturgess)
Seriously ill Several
Hospital emergency department presentations 87

These figures highlight the widespread consequences of what was initially intended as a targeted assassination attempt. The reckless disposal of the Novichok agent put countless innocent lives at risk, demonstrating the callous disregard for public safety shown by the perpetrators.

Dawn Sturgess inquiry reveals Sergei Skripal was vulnerable target in Novichok poisoning case

Police response and lessons learned

The inquiry also scrutinized the response of Wiltshire Police to the poisoning incidents. Jesse Nicholls, another representative for the Sturgess family, characterized the police’s actions as “severely inadequate.” He pointed out several shortcomings in their handling of the situation :

  1. Dismissal of paramedics’ correct assessment of nerve agent poisoning
  2. Putting first responders and the public at grave risk
  3. Failure to provide accurate information to Dawn Sturgess’ doctors
  4. Inaccurate characterization of Dawn Sturgess as a known drug user

These failings, according to Nicholls, caused significant pain to the Sturgess family and left lasting damage. He described the police response as “blighted by arrogance, stereotyping, and a lack of professionalism.”

In response to these criticisms, Wiltshire Police Chief Constable Catherine Roper acknowledged the force’s shortcomings and expressed condolences to Dawn Sturgess’ family and friends. She emphasized the importance of learning from each incident to improve service to the community, stating :

“It is crucial, in terms of constantly improving the service our communities receive, that we ensure we are actively learning from each incident we attend.”

The Chief Constable assured that the police had “captured every opportunity” to learn lessons from the hearings into Ms. Sturgess’ death. This commitment to improvement is essential in addressing the security vulnerabilities exposed by the Skripal case and ensuring better preparedness for future threats.

Strengthening national security measures

The Dawn Sturgess inquiry has highlighted critical gaps in the UK’s national security apparatus. The ease with which foreign agents were able to carry out an attack on British soil has prompted calls for a comprehensive review of protective measures for at-risk individuals and the general public.

Key areas for improvement include :

  • Enhanced security protocols for individuals with known connections to foreign intelligence services
  • Improved coordination between intelligence agencies and local law enforcement
  • Stricter monitoring of potential chemical warfare agents entering the country
  • Better training for first responders in identifying and dealing with chemical attacks
  • Increased public awareness and education on recognizing and reporting suspicious activities

The Skripal case serves as a stark reminder of the evolving nature of international espionage and the need for constant vigilance. As geopolitical tensions continue to simmer, it is imperative that the UK and other nations adapt their security strategies to address these emerging threats effectively.

By learning from the mistakes exposed in the Dawn Sturgess inquiry and implementing robust security measures, the UK can work towards preventing similar tragedies in the future. The safety of citizens must remain paramount, and the lessons from this case should serve as a catalyst for meaningful change in the realm of national security.

Romuald Hart
Scroll to Top