Protecting ancient trees : Should they receive the same heritage status as Stonehenge ?

Protecting ancient trees : Should they receive the same heritage status as Stonehenge ?

The recent felling of a 450-year-old oak tree at a Toby Carvery restaurant in Enfield has ignited national outrage comparable to the cutting of the Sycamore Gap tree in 2023. This ecological tragedy highlights a crucial question: should our ancient trees receive the same heritage protection as monuments like Stonehenge? These living monuments, some predating historical events like the Gunpowder Plot, represent irreplaceable ecological and cultural treasures that currently lack adequate legal safeguards.

Ancient trees: living monuments without protection

Unlike scheduled ancient monuments such as Stonehenge, Britain’s ancient trees currently exist in a legal limbo. The irony is striking: the only officially “listed” tree in the UK is already dead—the Elfin Oak stump in Kensington Gardens, protected for its carved cultural significance rather than its ecological value.

The vast majority of ancient trees lack any formal protection unless covered by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) or growing within designated conservation areas. Even then, these protections can be overruled for development projects, as demonstrated by the felling of the 250-year-old Cubbington Pear (once voted English Tree of the Year) to make way for HS2 in 2020.

Catherine Nuttgens, an independent urban forester, points out a bewildering contradiction: “It would be theoretically possible to grant listed status to the wrought iron props underneath the famous Major Oak in Sherwood Forest, but not the 1,000-year-old tree itself which they are designed to protect.”

This regulatory gap creates a situation where tree surgeons often become judge, jury and executioner regarding the fate of ancient trees. As Liam McGough, who runs a north London tree service, notes: “Anybody can buy a chainsaw and call themselves a tree surgeon,” highlighting the industry’s lack of standardized requirements beyond basic safety regulations.

Protection Type Available for Ancient Monuments Available for Ancient Trees
Listed/Scheduled Status Yes No (except the Elfin Oak stump)
National Legal Protection Yes No
Local Authority Protection Yes Limited (TPOs can be overruled)

The ecological and cultural significance at stake

The value of ancient trees extends far beyond their impressive longevity. A single ancient oak can harbor up to 2,300 species, creating entire ecosystems within one living organism. When such trees are felled, as with the Enfield oak, these complex biological communities are instantly destroyed.

With over 190,000 specimens logged on the UK’s Ancient Tree Inventory, these natural monuments represent living repositories of national history. Consider that Britain hosts more ancient oaks than the rest of Europe combined, or that numerous churchyards across England feature yew trees older than the buildings themselves.

These trees have witnessed pivotal moments in British history. For example, a millennium-old yew near Battle in East Sussex—felled in 2023 on private land—would have stood during the Norman invasion of 1066. The Magna Carta was written with ink derived from oak marble gall wasps, while the Queen Elizabeth Oak in Sussex reportedly sheltered the monarch during a 1591 hunting party.

Martin Hugi, a senior conservation adviser who undertook an “ancient tree pilgrimage” across Britain, observes: “From a cultural point of view, these organisms are probably the oldest entities that we will ever meet and that just deserves our respect in its own right.”

The case of the Toby Carvery oak

The felling of the ancient oak at Toby Carvery exemplifies the vulnerabilities in the current system. Despite being valued at £1 million (£300,000 more than the Sycamore Gap tree), this 450-year-old specimen was cut down based on contested health and safety concerns.

Mitchells and Butlers, the company owning Toby Carvery, claimed they had commissioned “specialist arboriculturist contractors” who advised felling the tree. However, this decision was made without seeking permissions from Enfield Council, the landowner, prompting council leader Ergin Erbil to express outrage and pursue legal action.

Tree experts who have examined photographs of the stump dispute the necessity of felling. As McGough states: “The condition of the wood demonstrates there was no need for the tree to be felled. It’s a huge loss to the area.”

Similar controversies continue to emerge across the UK, including the endangered 550-year-old Darwin Oak near Shrewsbury, threatened by a proposed bypass. Despite its nomination in the 2024 Tree of the Year contest and campaigns for protection similar to those seen at Stonehenge, Shropshire Council acknowledges that even a TPO wouldn’t protect it from the development.

Towards stronger protection frameworks

There are signs of potential progress in strengthening protections for ancient trees. Northern Ireland is currently seeking public consultation on a new tree protection bill that would introduce a heritage tree designation and improve enforcement mechanisms.

For comprehensive protection nationwide, experts suggest several approaches:

  • Creating a National Register of Heritage Trees with legal protections equivalent to scheduled monuments
  • Establishing standardized qualifications and licensing for tree surgeons working with veteran trees
  • Implementing substantial penalties for unauthorized felling of ancient specimens
  • Developing management plans that balance public safety with preservation

However, across the rest of Britain, no comparable legislative reforms are currently underway, leaving these living monuments vulnerable. The taped-off cordon around the stump in Enfield serves as a poignant reminder of what’s at stake: centuries of history and biodiversity that, once lost, cannot be recovered.

As we continue to protect stone monuments that tell our cultural story, the question becomes increasingly urgent: isn’t it time we granted the same reverence and legal protection to the living monuments that have witnessed our history unfold and provide critical habitat for thousands of species? The answer, for many conservationists and citizens alike, is a resounding yes.

Romuald Hart
Scroll to Top