Salisbury budget proposal may close two public toilets in cost-cutting measure

Salisbury budget proposal may close two public toilets in cost-cutting measure

Salisbury’s urban landscape is set to undergo significant changes as the city council grapples with budgetary constraints. The proposed 2024/25 city budget has sparked debate among local officials and residents alike, particularly regarding the potential closure of two public toilets. This cost-cutting measure, aimed at saving over £100,000 annually, has become a focal point of discussions surrounding the city’s financial future.

Proposed closures and their financial impact

The draft budget put forward by the administration outlines a plan to shutter two public toilet blocks in the 2025/26 fiscal year. These facilities, located in the Central Car Park and the underground Market Place, have long served Salisbury’s residents and visitors. However, their maintenance has become a significant financial burden for the city council.

By closing these facilities, the administration aims to achieve substantial savings:

  • £108,725 in annual cleaning fees
  • £5,000 from reduced toilet-related costs

It’s worth noting that the more modern disabled facility in Market Place would remain operational, ensuring continued accessibility for those with special needs. This selective approach demonstrates the council’s attempt to balance fiscal responsibility with public service provision.

The proposed closures have not gone unchallenged. The opposing Conservative group has suggested an alternative plan, recommending only the closure of the Market Place toilets. This more conservative approach would still yield savings of £58,725 per year, albeit significantly less than the administration’s proposal.

Political discourse and public opinion

The toilet closure debate has ignited passionate discussions among city councillors. At a recent Finance and Governance Committee meeting, held on January 6, 2025, the proposals were thoroughly examined. This meeting took place exactly one year after the council had previously stated it had “no intention” of closing the Market Place toilets, highlighting the rapidly changing financial landscape faced by local governments.

Councillor Victoria Charleston, the Liberal Democrats’ administration group leader, expressed hope that the toilet closures would not be permanent. This sentiment reflects a broader concern about the long-term implications of such cost-cutting measures on public amenities.

On the other side of the aisle, Conservative councillor Jeremy Nettle criticized the administration’s budget as “business as usual,” questioning its vision for the city’s future. He particularly objected to the proposed closure of the Central Car Park toilets, which have been highly regarded by the public.

Facility Current Status Proposed Action Public Opinion
Central Car Park Toilets Open Closure Highly regarded
Market Place Underground Toilets Open Closure Criticized for poor condition
Market Place Disabled Facility Open Remain open Essential service

Broader budget implications and alternative proposals

The toilet closure debate is just one aspect of a larger budgetary discussion. The administration’s draft budget, which was voted through with two amendments, is set to be considered at a full council meeting on January 13, 2025. If approved, it would likely result in a 4.99% council tax increase for Band D properties, translating to an additional £18.15 per year or 35p per week towards the city’s precept.

While the administration defends its budget as “realistic, prudent and sensible,” the Conservative group has put forward alternative proposals aimed at giving residents “a bit of hope.” These include:

  1. Investing £350,000 to enhance the Churchill Gardens car park
  2. Allocating £350,000 for a multi-use artificial pitch in the Bemerton area
  3. Dedicating £250,000 to a splash park project

However, these proposals come with their own set of trade-offs, including suggested cuts to annual grants for cultural institutions like the Salisbury Museum and Playhouse, as well as a temporary suspension of community grants.

Interestingly, amidst these budget discussions, Salisbury is also seeing progress in other areas of urban development. The Salisbury Planning Commission greenlights downtown residential development project, signaling a commitment to urban growth despite financial challenges.

Public facilities and urban planning

The potential closure of public toilets raises broader questions about urban planning and the provision of essential services in Salisbury. Mayor Sven Hocking’s suggestion to “fill them in with concrete and put something on top” of the Market Place toilets reflects a desire to repurpose urban spaces for new uses.

This idea aligns with a proposed amendment to the administration’s draft budget, which considers building a stage in Market Square as a “multi-use communal facility.” The proposal includes a six-week trial at a cost of £20,000 to assess the feasibility of a permanent structure.

Additionally, the budget amendments include setting aside £6,000 per year for improved public consultation on political decisions. This move towards greater transparency and community engagement could help bridge the gap between fiscal necessities and public expectations.

As Salisbury navigates these challenging financial waters, the city must balance fiscal responsibility with the preservation of public amenities. The ongoing debate over public toilet closures serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing urban planners and local governments in the mid-2020s. As the city evolves, finding innovative solutions that meet both budgetary constraints and community needs will be crucial for Salisbury’s future development and livability.

Romuald Hart
Scroll to Top