Why men are so unhealthy : understanding the root causes of male health disparities

Why men are so unhealthy : understanding the root causes of male health disparities

Male health disparities have become an increasingly urgent concern, with men facing significantly higher rates of premature death and chronic illness compared to women. The statistics paint a concerning picture – men die approximately four years earlier than women and face nearly 60% higher risk of premature death before 75. This article examines the complex factors behind men’s poor health outcomes and explores potential solutions to address this growing crisis.

Behavioral and biological factors contributing to male health risks

Men consistently demonstrate higher-risk health behaviors compared to women across multiple categories. Statistics show males are more likely to smoke, consume excessive alcohol, use recreational drugs, and develop high cholesterol and blood pressure. These behaviors aren’t simply personal choices but reflect complex social and cultural expectations placed on men.

Professor Alan White, co-founder of the Men’s Health Forum charity, emphasizes that blaming men’s health issues solely on lifestyle choices overlooks deeper issues. “It’s much more complex than that,” he notes. Biological factors play a significant role – male immune systems generally demonstrate less resilience against infections, as evidenced during the pandemic when 19,000 more men than women died from COVID-19.

The economic landscape also impacts male health outcomes. With Bank of England slashes rates to 4.5% and halves UK growth outlook amid economic concerns, financial pressures continue mounting on working-class men in particular, further exacerbating stress-related health concerns.

Health engagement patterns differ dramatically between genders:

  • Women typically establish regular healthcare relationships through contraception needs
  • Routine cervical screenings bring women into medical settings regularly
  • Pregnancy and childbirth create ongoing healthcare connections
  • Men often go decades without meaningful healthcare interactions
  • Less than 40% of eligible men attend free NHS health checks

Socioeconomic determinants and access barriers

The health gap between socioeconomic groups reveals stark disparities in male health outcomes. Mark Brooks, policy adviser for the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Men’s and Boy’s Issues, highlights that life expectancy in Britain’s poorest communities is approximately 10 years lower than in wealthy areas – a larger gap than observed among women.

Working-class men face particular challenges accessing healthcare. Those employed in construction, manufacturing, and other blue-collar professions often encounter significant barriers to attending medical appointments. Many fear job repercussions for taking time off, leading some to ignore concerning symptoms or hide developing health conditions from employers.

Brooks advocates for structural changes to address these barriers: “Someone working in construction or on an industrial estate will find it very difficult to take time off whether that’s for a health check or to go and see their GP.” His proposed solutions include giving employees paid time off specifically for health screenings and bringing healthcare services directly to workplaces.

Demographic Factor Health Impact Intervention Needed
Working Class Men 3.5x higher premature death rate Workplace health services, paid health leave
Black Men 2x higher prostate cancer diagnosis Targeted screening programs, cultural sensitivity
South Asian Men Elevated diabetes risk Culturally-appropriate health education, community outreach

Ethnic differences further complicate the picture. Black men face twice the risk of prostate cancer diagnosis, while men from Indian and Bangladeshi backgrounds show particularly high vulnerability to diabetes. These disparities highlight the need for culturally sensitive and targeted healthcare approaches that consider both social determinants and biological factors.

Mental health challenges and innovative solutions

The mental health statistics for men reveal a troubling pattern – three-quarters of suicide victims are male, yet men represent only one-third of patients referred for talking therapies. This discrepancy suggests fundamental misalignments between how men experience psychological distress and how mental health services operate.

Professor White explains that men often express mental health struggles differently: “How services are set up to recognize signs of depression and anxiety is not how men express them – they are more likely to display signs of anger, abuse alcohol or become withdrawn and push people away.” This creates a dangerous gap in care delivery.

Innovative approaches are emerging to better engage men in health promotion. Professor Paul Galdas from York University emphasizes that men do care about their health but respond better to action-oriented approaches: “Men will open up and want to be engaged, but to do that you have to base it around actions and activities.”

The six-week mental fitness program developed in partnership with the Movember men’s health movement exemplifies this approach. Originally trialed with NHS frontline workers after COVID-19, the program is now being implemented with Leeds United youth players. Participants learn to track habits, set health goals, and develop practical problem-solving skills.

Community-based initiatives like the Men’s Sheds movement represent another successful model. These spaces encourage men to build social connections while engaging in practical projects, creating supportive environments where health discussions can happen naturally. Such activity-centered approaches recognize that men often build relationships and discuss personal concerns more comfortably while engaged in shared tasks.

Addressing the male health crisis

The government’s forthcoming men’s health strategy represents a critical opportunity to transform male health outcomes. Professor White believes this initiative will “shine a spotlight” on men’s health challenges in ways similar to how the 2022 women’s health strategy led to tangible infrastructure changes, including dedicated women’s health hubs.

Beyond policy changes, men themselves have essential roles in addressing the crisis. Simple yet impactful personal steps include monitoring waist size, increasing physical activity, maintaining social connections, and taking advantage of available health screenings.

The solution requires coordinated action across multiple fronts – from healthcare system redesigns that meet men where they are to educational approaches that build health literacy from younger ages. Only through comprehensive efforts that address both structural barriers and behavioral factors can we begin to close the concerning gap in health outcomes between men and women.

Romuald Hart
Scroll to Top